IMA calls for clarification from the Home Office  

EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members who submitted a valid application to the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) but are awaiting the outcome of their application should receive a Certificate of Application (CoA) immediately.

While it does not confirm that the person has immigration status in the UK under the EUSS, it can be used to evidence the temporary protection of their rights, for example the right to work, rent or access benefits, while the decision on their application, or any administrative review or appeal, remains pending.

Home Office guidance on CoAs can be found here.

Following the reports of issues at the border for some citizens, the IMA has written to the Home Office to seek clarification of its position on the rights of citizens in receipt of a CoA when travelling, including where an administrative review is pending.

The IMA has also issued guidance to pre-settled and settled status holders around absences from the UK and how it may affect your EUSS status.

The IMA encourages any EU or EEA EFTA citizen or their family members who believe their rights are not being upheld to submit a complaint to its online portal.

For more information visit the IMA’s website for detailed information on the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members who have applied to the EUSS.

 

How absence from the UK may affect your EUSS status

Understanding how absences from the UK can impact EUSS status can be confusing.

We have been told that extensions of pre-settled status and changes to the rules around automatic lapsing of status following time spent outside the UK have potentially added to this confusion.

The rules which govern how long a person with EUSS status can spend outside the UK are different depending on whether you have pre-settled status or settled status.

The Home Office has published guidance on its approach to absences and how it may impact a citizen’s EUSS status.

Settled status

If you have settled status, you can live outside the UK for up to 5 consecutive years without your absence affecting your EUSS status and your ability to return to live and work in the UK.

Pre-settled status

To retain your eligibility for pre-settled status and, after 5 years, be able to qualify for settled status, you will need to show that you have maintained your continuous residence in the UK.

The rules on continuity of residence provide that you can be absent from the UK for up to 6 months in any 12-month period without affecting your continuous residence in the UK or your ability to qualify for settled status.

There are also some circumstances in which an absence from the UK of more than 6 months in a 12-month period will be permitted, such as:

  • one period of up to 12 months for an important reason – for example, childbirth, serious illness, study, vocational training, an overseas work posting or because of coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • compulsory military service of any length
  • time you spent abroad as a Crown servant, or as the partner or child of a Crown servant
  • time you spent abroad in the Armed Forces, or as the partner or child of someone in the Armed Forces
  • time you spent working in the UK marine area

Separate guidance is available if you were outside the UK for more than 12 months because of COVID-19.

EU and EEA EFTA citizens (and their family members) with pre-settled status who have lived in the UK for at least 5 years and have acquired the right of permanent residence automatically under the Agreements, can also live outside the UK for up to 5 consecutive years without it affecting their EUSS status and their ability to return to live and work in the UK. It is important to note that the right of permanent residence must have been acquired before you left the UK.

Whether, as a pre-settled status holder, you have acquired the right of permanent residence automatically under the Agreements depends on certain conditions being met. For example, if you have worked in the UK as an EU or EEA EFTA citizen for 5 years since before 31 December 2020, then you will have acquired the right of permanent residence. However, in this example, you would need to evidence those 5 years of work in the UK in order to benefit from the right to live outside the UK for up to 5 years. The easiest way to evidence your right to live permanently in the UK (and to live outside the UK for up to 5 years) is to obtain settled status under the EUSS.

If you hold pre-settled status, but do not know whether you have acquired the right of permanent residence automatically under the Agreements and wish to leave the UK for more than 6 months (and without obtaining settled status under the EUSS), then you should seek independent immigration advice on your circumstances from an immigration adviser registered with the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC).

In April 2024, the IMA reported on the Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) Order 2024. The effect of the Order is that pre-settled status will automatically lapse after more than 5 consecutive years of absence from the UK. Prior to the change, pre-settled status would automatically lapse after more than 2 consecutive years of absence from the UK.

It is important to note that this change is separate to the rules on continuity of residence, which remain as set out above, and does not extend the absence from the UK permitted for a pre-settled status holder to retain their eligibility for pre-settled status and, after 5years, be able to qualify for settled status. If in doubt, you should seek independent immigration advice on your circumstances from an immigration adviser registered with the OISC.

It is also important to note that an extension of pre-settled status does not alter the rules on continuity of residence as set out above. If continuous residence in the UK has been broken, then you may no longer meet the eligibility criteria for your status,  even if you have been granted an extension by the Home Office.

The IMA encourages any EU or EEA EFTA citizen or their family members who believe their rights are not being upheld to submit a complaint to its online portal.

For more information visit the IMA’s website for detailed information on the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members who have applied to the EUSS.

Further information can also be found the FAQs section of our website.

 

 

IMA works to ensure landmark decision is correctly implemented by DWP

The IMA, which was set up to monitor and promote the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members, intervened in the case against the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions’ (SSWP).

In the case, DWP had said that an EU citizen (AT) was refused Universal Credit as she had pre-settled status but did not have a qualifying right to reside. By not being able to claim the benefit, AT was at risk of destitution as she had fled her home with her child after being the victim of domestic violence.

The courts consistently found that the protection of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) to be able to live in dignified conditions applies under the Withdrawal Agreement in certain circumstances. In this case, AT was able to rely on her Charter right to live in dignified conditions and therefore was able to access Universal Credit.

Claims for Universal Credit for those in similar circumstances to AT had their applications put on hold whilst litigation was ongoing. Following the conclusion of this case, the IMA is pleased to confirm these applications are now being processed.

The IMA is now monitoring how DWP is implementing the judgment and the progress on its plans to clear the backlog of Universal Credit applications that were previously put on hold. It is also looking into the wider implementation of the Charter to eligible cohorts.

The IMA continues to seek clarity on the way that claims are being assessed to assure itself that the judgment is being properly applied. The DWP has released guidance to caseworkers on Charter rights assessment following SSWP v AT.  This guidance is being used to aid caseworkers in their decision making in cases similar to AT. The caseworker guidance is being used in the historic cases that are now being processed and for all future claims. The IMA has provided feedback to DWP on the revised caseworker guidance.

A further public statement with updates will be published in due course.

The IMA also continues to review the broader impact of the judgment across Government. The IMA is engaging with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to assess the impact of the judgment to homelessness assistance.

The IMA welcomes the collaborative approach to resolve matters in these areas as we recognise this impacts some of the most vulnerable citizens in our society.

The IMA encourages any citizens who have been impacted by the judgment and have experienced issues with either Universal Credit, Pension Credit, Housing Benefit or homelessness assistance to contact us through our onlineportal.

IMA urges parents and carers to check their children’s EUSS application status

Concerns have been raised with the IMA regarding parents and carers paying thousands of pounds for NHS treatment for their children after missing the deadline for submitting an EUSS application on their behalf.  

Parents and carers must apply to the EUSS within 90 days of their child being born or adopted in the UK; or if the child is living abroad and coming to join them in the UK.  

Although the deadline for applications for most people was 30 June 2021, parents and carers can still apply for their child – or they can apply for themselves – if they lived in the UK by 31 December 2020. 

EU and EEA EFTA citizens who have applied to the EUSS, have a number of rights in the UK or Gibraltar. Their family members also share these rights. 

Applying for EUSS protects rights to:  

  • Work in the UK 
  • Use the NHS for free 
  • Enroll in education or study in the UK 
  • Access public funds such as benefits and pensions (if eligible) 
  • Travel in and out of the UK  

Further information on how to check whether your child is eligible to apply and the documents you will need for the application can be found on the GOV.UK website. 

Applying to the EUSS is free. You can apply here 

IMA is assured that Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland are protecting the rights of looked after children and care leavers

Following the UK’s departure from the EU, all eligible citizens, including children, are required to apply to the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) and obtain a grant of Pre-Settled or Settled Status to guarantee their rights to live, work, study, and access benefits in the UK. 

The IMA launched a review of Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland to establish how they identify looked after children and care leavers who need to apply to the EUSS, and the procedures put in place to monitor those applications.       

As part of our monitoring duties, we are undertaking assurance reviews across all local authorities in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. You can read our Assurance Review Reports here. 

The initial review in Northern Ireland looked at information in three key areas; identification, record keeping and retrospective checks, with each local authority categorised as red, amber or green in a grading system.   

The IMA identified no overarching concerns based on the responses from all five Health and Social Care Trusts and is sufficiently assured based on the information provided about the robustness of identification processes, record keeping and retrospective checks.  

The report can be located here 

Pam Everett, IMA Director of Operational Delivery said: “The IMA has welcomed the positive collaboration with Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland who have sufficiently assured the IMA that each Trust is discharging their responsibilities and are providing appropriate support in relation to making and supporting EUSS applications on behalf of all eligible looked after children, children in receipt of Health and Social Care Trust care and support, and care leavers.   

“Those who have successful applications should have guaranteed their rights to continue to live, study and work in the UK.”  

Based on the information provided, the IMA does not at this stage consider that further compliance action is required by any Health and Social Care Trust in Northern Ireland.   

The initial review of all local authorities and Health and Social Care across the UK have been completed as part of Phase 1 of this work.  The IMA will continue with individual assurance reviews across England and Scotland.   

 

IMA Welcomes Home Office Decisions On Measures To Implement Landmark Judgment

The judge had ruled in favour of the IMA in December 2022 and clarified that the Withdrawal Agreement residence right of a person with pre-settled status does not expire because someone does not make a second application to the scheme, provided they continue to meet the necessary conditions.

The judgment also found that irrespective of an application for settled status, those who have lived here for five years and have continued to meet the relevant conditions (as set out in the Agreements) are automatically entitled to permanent residence rights under the relevant Agreements.

The IMA raised significant concerns with the Home Office about its original measures to implement the judgement and discussed further changes to mitigate these issues.

In the IMA’s view, the Home Office’s initial approach of automatically applying a two-year extension to pre-settled status holders shortly before they approach their current date of expiry did not go far enough to address the judgment. This was because it could potentially adversely impact their rights.

The IMA was concerned this position may have continued to cause challenges for citizens, for example with employment or housing, due to the continued temporary nature of pre settled status being visible to third parties when checking a citizens’ status. The judgment was clear, status should not expire providing the person continues to meet the underlying conditions.

The IMA emphasised its concerns about this approach by the Home Office and sought a review of how they were implementing the judgment. The Home Office has now outlined several further changes it intends to make, some of which have been undertaken. These include:

  • Removal of pre-settled expiry dates from View & Prove and right to work (including licensing) and right to rent checking services for third parties – this has now been undertaken;
  • Removal of the requirement for employers and landlords to carry out follow-up checks once pre-settled status has been initially determined;
  • A five-year extension to pre-settled status instead of the current two-year extension and;
  • A public statement to make it clear to citizens how the judgment is being implemented.

Miranda Biddle, Chief Executive of IMA said: “From the outset we have always been clear that the court’s ruling is implemented in a manner that provides clarity and practical resolution for citizens.

“At the same time, it is crucial that in implementing the judgment, the uncertainties being faced in relation to citizens’ ability to access and prove their rights are addressed and concluded.

“We therefore welcome the package of measures which the Home Office has announced they will be putting in place as a pragmatic way of ensuring the principles of the judgment are upheld.

“This will mean that citizens with pre-settled status are assured they will not experience issues when proving their rights to  work and rent  as their digital status end-date will not be visible to landlords, employers and other external third parties.

“The IMA will continue to hold the Home Office to account and will now be monitoring how these measures are implemented.”

The IMA will also continue to give updates on this issue and will be seeking assurance on how these changes are made. We also reserve the right to take further action, including litigation, if necessary, if these measures do not prove effective in ensuring that the rights of citizens are upheld.

Anyone facing difficulties accessing their rights is encouraged to contact the IMA for support.

For more information visit the IMA’s website for detailed information on the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members who have applied to the EUSS.

Citizens’ Rights’ Watchdog Calls For Resolution On Landmark High Court Case Implementation

The judge ruled in favour of the IMA and clarified that the Withdrawal Agreement residence right of a person with pre-settled status does not expire for failure to make a second application to the scheme. This is provided they continue to meet the conditions for it.

The judgment also found that, irrespective of an application for settled status, those who have lived here for five years and have continued to meet the relevant conditions (as set out in the Agreements), are automatically entitled to permanent residence   rights under the relevant Agreement.

In the IMA’s view, the current Home Office approach of automatically applying a two-year extension to all pre-settled status holders shortly before they approach their current date of expiry does not go far enough to address the first aspect of the High Court’s ruling. This is because it could potentially adversely impact their residency rights.

The IMA is concerned that this  approach may continue to cause challenges for citizens, for example with employment or housing, due to the continued temporary nature of pre settled status being visible on official documents. However, status should not expire in practice providing the person continues to meet the underlying conditions.

The IMA is holding regular meetings with the Home Office to better understand its plans for how the judgment will be implemented. We understand that the Home Office is nearing a final view on proposals that seek to provide practical solutions for citizens. The IMA will continue to promote workable resolutions and monitor the effectiveness of any changes.

Miranda Biddle, Chief Executive of IMA said:

“The IMA is keen to ensure that citizens’ rights are upheld and the court’s ruling is implemented in a manner that provides clarity and practical resolution for citizens.

It is crucial that in implementing the judgment the uncertainties being faced  in relation to citizens’ ability to live, work and raise their families in the UK are addressed and concluded.

The IMA will continue to hold the Home Office to account and urge them to implement the necessary changes when finalised.”

Anyone facing difficulties accessing their rights is encouraged to contact the IMA for support. There are also a number of supporting organisations listed on our website who can assist with EUSS applications. If you would like to share information with the IMA on behalf of EU and EEA EFTA citizens, then please visit www.ima-citizensrights/report-a-complaint

 

Interim Chair Appointed to IMA

This follows the resignation of Sir Ashley Fox after being selected as the Parliamentary Candidate for the Bridgwater constituency for the Conservative Party.

Leo has been a Board Member and Deputy Chair of the IMA since its inception in December 2020. He is a Member of the Senate of Queen’s University Belfast and a member of the Council of the Institute of Professional and Legal Studies in Belfast.

Leo said, “I have thoroughly enjoyed being a part of the IMA Board for the past three years as we have established ourselves to undertake the important work of the IMA to monitor and promote how the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members are upheld by public bodies.

“I am proud of what has been achieved so far and am delighted to take on the role of Interim Chair to help continue the good work of the IMA until a permanent Chair is in place.”

Chief Executive of the IMA, Miranda Biddle said: “I am grateful for the support Leo has provided to the IMA since Sir Ashley stood down from his role. I look forward to continuing to work with Leo to ensure the IMA is fulfilling its duties to promote and protect the rights of those EU and EEA EFTA citizens who have rights under the Withdrawal and Separation Agreements so that they can continue to live, work and raise families, here and in Gibraltar, as they did before the UK left the EU.”

The IMA, Ministry of Justice and the public appointments team are now working at pace on the recruitment process for the permanent position of Chair of the IMA.

Full details of the recruitment process can be found here.

Citizens’ Rights Watchdog Welcomes Supreme Court Appeal Decision

This means that the Court of Appeal’s decision stands, which we welcome due to the clarity that this decision gives on key areas of the Withdrawal Agreement.

The IMA, which was set up to monitor and promote the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members, had intervened in the case which concerned whether the SSWP had breached the rights of an EU citizen (AT) by refusing her claim for Universal Credit.

The SSWP had said that AT was not allowed to claim Universal Credit as while she had pre-settled status, she did not have a qualifying right to reside such as being a worker and therefore was ineligible to claim this benefit.

AT successfully argued throughout the courts, including in the Upper Tribunal and Court of Appeal, that in refusing her Universal Credit, the SSWP had breached her Withdrawal Agreement rights. The courts consistently found that the protection in the Charter of Fundamental Rights to be able to live in dignified conditions applies under the Withdrawal Agreement in certain circumstances.

The IMA’s independent view was that AT was able to rely on her Charter right to live in dignified conditions and therefore was able to access Universal Credit. This was also the basis of AT’s case. The Court of Appeal agreed.

The decision of the Supreme Court now means that other citizens who have had their claims for Universal Credit put on hold for similar reasons to AT will now have to have their claims decided.

The IMA also believes that the decision has a broader impact and will continue to speak to the SSWP about how he will implement the judgment and will provide further updates when these are available.

General Counsel for the IMA, Rhys Davies said, “We intervened in this matter as it is a case of significant public importance concerning the interpretation of the Withdrawal Agreement and also the continued role of the Charter following the end of the transition period. We now have clarity from the courts and can move to ensure that those within scope of the Withdrawal Agreement can fully access their rights.”

The Court of Appeal hearing was listed on 8-10 March 2023. The IMA’s skeleton argument can be read here and the judgment here.

The IMA encourages any citizen experiencing difficulties in exercising their rights to make them aware of this through their online portal.

If you are engaging in litigation in relation to your Withdrawal Agreement rights, please tell us by sending us details at litigation@IMA-citizensrights.org.uk. It helps to inform us where there may be issues with citizens accessing their rights.

Citizens Rights Watchdog Gives Update on Judicial Review

In December 2022, the High Court found certain aspects of the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) to be unlawful. The Court’s ruling affects more than two million EU and EEA EFTA citizens with pre-settled status.

The judge ruled that individuals with rights under the Agreements should not lose their right to live in the UK if they do not make a second application to the EUSS. Also, those with pre-settled status automatically acquire permanent residence rights once they have lived here for five years and met the relevant conditions under the Agreements.

The EUSS is the way which EU and EEA EFTA citizens and their family members secure the right to live in the UK. There are two types of EUSS status: pre-settled status for those that have lived in the UK for under five years and settled status, usually for those who have lived here for over five years.

The Home Office plans to address the High Court’s judgment by granting a two-year extension of pre-settled status for those who haven’t switched to settled status shortly before their original expiry date, automatically converting as many pre-settled status holders to settled status as possible and ensuring individuals can rely on their permanent residency rights once acquired.

The IMA is concerned that a two-year extension for pre-settled status does not address the Court’s ruling and that citizens may face challenges in areas of their lives, such as employment or housing due to the temporary nature of pre-settled status being reflected on official documents.

It is also highlighting a lack of clarity for citizens and authorities regarding automatic acquisition of permanent rights, leading to potential confusion.

The IMA is urging the Home Office to make a public statement clarifying the rights of citizens under the Agreements.

Miranda Biddle, Chief Executive of IMA said: “We continue to work with the Home Office to resolve potential issues arising from the proposed implementation of the High Court judgment. While the Home Office has been effective in many cases, some citizens face uncertainty impacting their ability to live, work, and raise families in the UK.”

The IMA will continue to give updates on this issue but in the meantime, anyone facing difficulties accessing their rights is encouraged to contact the IMA for support.

For more information visit the IMA’s website for detailed information on the rights of EU and EEA EFTA citizens who have applied to the EUSS.

For further information on changes to the EU Settlement Scheme as a result of the Judicial Review please visit the FAQs section of our website.